Topic: First shots with

I just got my eBay bargain (

Last edited by condyk (2006-01-21 10:09:00)

Gear: Canon 5D/Handstrap; (MF) Carl Zeiss Jena: Sonnar DDR 135mm 3.5; Pentax-M: SMC 50mm 1.4, 1.7 & Super Takumar 200mm 4.0; Helios-44M 58mm 2.0; (AF) Canon 50mm 1.4, 100-400mm IS L & 24-105mm IS L; The Pod, Crumpler December Quarter, Manfrotto MF190 & 488RC2, Manfrotto Neotec monopod.

Re: First shots with

Nice lens, very sharp at f2 and beautiful cats! and very good price smile

Bye
Bruno

Bruno
My flickr
eos 5D  contax 18 25 28 35 50 85 100 135  om zuiko 21 24 35 50 80 100 summicron 35 90 135 100 APO telyt 180
some Takumars   contax N 24-85 canon EF 70-200L

Re: First shots with

Nice ! The Helios has a good pr

Canon 350D and a few lens -- Tachihara 8x10. Chamonix 45N-1, Crown Graphic 4x5. Moskva, Zeiss Super Ikonta C
Bronica S2A, Agfa Super Isolette, Iskra, Rolleiflex. Leica M2, Bessa R, Zorki 1,3,3M and a few more...

Re: First shots with

Which version of the Helios did you get condyk? I got the first version for M42, called just "Helios-44". According to the manufacturer it is the least sharp of all the different versions (if you read russian, it is at http://zenit.istra.ru/archive/lenses/helios-44.html), but I am absolutely amazed by what it can do.

It is a nice lens to learn lens servicing as well... rather easy to take apart. I had to, as the focus ring was stuck. However, several of the small screws died in the process of tightening them again. Very bristle...

I'm also looking for a front cap wink Fortunately it is a standard and very common size, 49 mm. I now put a Takumar lens cap on it - as I have the non-MC version of the Helios, flare is the worst I've ever seen. Missing a back cap as well...

Enough talk... some pictures. Helios-44 58/2 at f8 on Canon 20D.

http://esperanto.homeip.net/Sjoerd/fotofanforum/2005_20D_14113-ete.jpg

http://esperanto.homeip.net/Sjoerd/fotofanforum/2005_20D_14117-ete.jpg

Re: First shots with

Dang fine shooting sir. A 'secret' lens this one with proficiencies beyond the exceptionally meagre prices. I dunno which breed mine is. It arrived in bubble wrap and what looked like a mouse nest of shredded newspaper! It does say 44-M but it doesn't look like it's coated, but who knows.

Gear: Canon 5D/Handstrap; (MF) Carl Zeiss Jena: Sonnar DDR 135mm 3.5; Pentax-M: SMC 50mm 1.4, 1.7 & Super Takumar 200mm 4.0; Helios-44M 58mm 2.0; (AF) Canon 50mm 1.4, 100-400mm IS L & 24-105mm IS L; The Pod, Crumpler December Quarter, Manfrotto MF190 & 488RC2, Manfrotto Neotec monopod.

Re: First shots with

my vote fot helios, too. one of my fevorite lense (i have older version), sharp from f2, bokeh is uncredible. i get my for something like 2

eos: 300d, 30d, 50e, 500n, 70-200/4, tamy 17-50/2.8, 50/1.8 II, sigma 15-30(waiting for repair)
c/y: contax 167mt, zeiss 50/1.7, sigma 24/2.8 II, soligor 60-300
m42: carl zeiss jena: 20/2.8, 35/2.4, 180/2.8 (p6 mount), helios-44 58/2, macro bellows
rangefinders: yashica lynx 14e, ricoh 500g, canon canonet 17 gIII ql (black)

Re: First shots with

condyk wrote:

Dang fine shooting sir. A 'secret' lens this one with proficiencies beyond the exceptionally meagre prices. I dunno which breed mine is. It arrived in bubble wrap and what looked like a mouse nest of shredded newspaper! It does say 44-M but it doesn't look like it's coated, but who knows.

If it does not say MC somewhere, I think it isn't, as there are some versions on which MC is indicated. Anyway, the 44-M is much newer than my 44, but it's still the same design anyway. One day (sooner rather than later) I'll probably buy an M version as well - this lens is my favorite at (around) 50 mm!

Re: First shots with

I recently bought one of these also, it's the old pre-set type Helios 44-2.

I think I read that the 44M's (44M-1 through to like, 44M-6) are the multicoated ones?  I think 44M-4 is when the auto diaphragm also makes an appearance?

My 44-2 is in terrible condition (was only $8US) but it works fine. However it does look like it was kicked around a car park, and there are many fine cleaning scratches on it, plus the oily blades...

Anyway, it's a great little lens for sure, I want another, newer one. smile

Last edited by RedAlizarin (2006-01-25 10:38:07)

M42 Asahi Super-Takumar 24 3.5, 50 1.4, 55 1.8, 200 4.0 | Pentacon 29 2.8 | CJZ Tessar 50 2.8 | Helios-44-2, Helios-44M-4, MC Helios-44M-7 58 2.0 | Hanimex Tele-Auto 135 3.5 | INA 135 3.5. Canon EOS 20D. EF-S 10-22. EF 17-40 4L, 28-105 3.5-4.5, 50 1.8, CZJ 70-210 4-5.6 and Sigma 105 2.8.

Re: First shots with

RedAlizarin wrote:

I think I read that the 44M's (44M-1 through to like, 44M-6) are the multicoated ones?  I think 44M-4 is when the auto diaphragm also makes an appearance?

My 44-2 is in terrible condition (was only $8US) but it works fine. However it does look like it was kicked around a car park, and there are many fine cleaning scratches on it, plus the oily blades...

Anyway, it's a great little lens for sure, I want another, newer one. smile

The factory's page on this lens (http://zenit.istra.ru/archive/lenses/helios-44.html) indicates that of the 44M-4 there is both a standard and an MC version, all later ones (M-5..7 and K-4) are in MC version only. I think the "M" designation was introduced to distinguish the M42 version from the bajonett (K) version. The page has a list of resolutions of the different versions - the MC ones are sharper than the non-MC ones (newer design I guess - and I don't know if quality control was as good on all versions). Also, the MC ones let through more light (0,85-0,9 instead of 0,80-0,81).
So, I hope to get hold of a 44M-7 one day...

No idea about the auto-diafragm though... it seems to me (from the pictures) that the 44-7 has auto diafragma as well, not only the M and K versions. Personally I like the preset!

Post some pictures taken with yours!

Re: First shots with

Ah... yes, that's makes much more sense regarding the 'M' designation.  Interesting about the MC versions too... and I'm with you on the 44M-7 - sounds perfect.

I haven't been too busy with the camera lately, but this is a photo I took with the Helios to try and get an idea about how it renders bokeh highlights:

http://www.ciar-roisin.net/photos/5927_144-2.jpg
Helios 44-2. 1/15, F2.8, ISO100.

I don't think it's too bad - the highlights aren't terribly distracting.  They are pretty neutral and inoffensive, and even a tad smoother at F/2:

http://www.ciar-roisin.net/presources/Images/Lenses/5820-02.jpg
Helios 44-2. 1/20, F2.0, ISO100. (50% Crop Detail)

Sorry I don't have anything a bit more picturesque and interesting from this nifty lens!

M42 Asahi Super-Takumar 24 3.5, 50 1.4, 55 1.8, 200 4.0 | Pentacon 29 2.8 | CJZ Tessar 50 2.8 | Helios-44-2, Helios-44M-4, MC Helios-44M-7 58 2.0 | Hanimex Tele-Auto 135 3.5 | INA 135 3.5. Canon EOS 20D. EF-S 10-22. EF 17-40 4L, 28-105 3.5-4.5, 50 1.8, CZJ 70-210 4-5.6 and Sigma 105 2.8.

Re: First shots with

I just bought a pair of Helios 44M-4's off eBay.  They are new condition/old stock I think.  Not the 44M-7 of my dreams, but new lenses with no issues at least!  Fingers crossed. smile

M42 Asahi Super-Takumar 24 3.5, 50 1.4, 55 1.8, 200 4.0 | Pentacon 29 2.8 | CJZ Tessar 50 2.8 | Helios-44-2, Helios-44M-4, MC Helios-44M-7 58 2.0 | Hanimex Tele-Auto 135 3.5 | INA 135 3.5. Canon EOS 20D. EF-S 10-22. EF 17-40 4L, 28-105 3.5-4.5, 50 1.8, CZJ 70-210 4-5.6 and Sigma 105 2.8.

Re: First shots with

RedAlizarin wrote:

I just bought a pair of Helios 44M-4's off eBay.  They are new condition/old stock I think.  Not the 44M-7 of my dreams, but new lenses with no issues at least!  Fingers crossed. smile

Well, looking at your pictures your "terrible condition" 44-2 is already giving you a lot of fun! I saw some M-4 on Ebay - but somehow I have the feeling that I might end up using it less that my original 44. But if a -7 comes along...

Re: First shots with

Yeah, I think I may have a MC 44M-7 soon-ish actually.  It will be interesting to test all three in a couple of weeks and see what's what... smile

M42 Asahi Super-Takumar 24 3.5, 50 1.4, 55 1.8, 200 4.0 | Pentacon 29 2.8 | CJZ Tessar 50 2.8 | Helios-44-2, Helios-44M-4, MC Helios-44M-7 58 2.0 | Hanimex Tele-Auto 135 3.5 | INA 135 3.5. Canon EOS 20D. EF-S 10-22. EF 17-40 4L, 28-105 3.5-4.5, 50 1.8, CZJ 70-210 4-5.6 and Sigma 105 2.8.

Re: First shots with

Has anyone purchased a Helios 44m-7 or tried one out yet?

They are out because I found this.

http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/browse?id=31299

Last edited by metroside (2007-02-07 13:54:13)

My Gear:  Canon EOS D60 , EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6, EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Super-Takumar 135mm/1:3,5, Super-Takumar 55mm/f1.8, Vivitar Zoom 75-205mm/f3.8, Helios 44M 58/2, Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Tessar 50/2.8, Helios 44-2 58/2, Protonar 28mm f.28, Rikenon 35mm f2.8, Meyer-Optik Domiplan 50/2.8, Cosinon 55mm f2.8

My Gallery: http://www.metroside.com/default.asp?pa … ;docID=197

Re: First shots with

I have a copy of 44M-7 and I'm not impressed by it. My 44M-4 and 44-2 are better.

Re: First shots with

Who did you get your caps from Buze? I need several...keeping some of my lenses wrapped up in terry toweling socks at the moment. Not ideal but cheap.

Was it here? http://stores.ebay.co.uk/ASIAN-CAMERA

It's a few M42 rear caps I'm after and sundry front ones.

Last edited by BeatPoet (2007-02-07 19:55:26)

Digital Cameras/AF Lenses: Canon EOS20D, EOS350D, Fuji F10 - Tokina 12-24, Sigma 18-125

MF Lenses: Nikon-AIS 1.8/50, Nikkor-S 2.8/35, Olympus Zuiko 2.8/28, Olympus Zuiko 1.8/50, Tamron 2.5/28, CZJ 2.4/35 Flek, Nikon E 2.8/100, Meyer-Orestegor 2.8/100, Pentacon 2.8/135, Pentacon 4/200

Re: First shots with

44M-4 and 44-2 with 44M-5 are really perfect . The only one that's nor present i my - hmm - collection is the 44M-7 .
Thanks a lot , buze !  I'm also fan of russian 135mm : jupiter, tair and apo-telezenitar . Just try one of them ...